I keep seeing this asked, and the two-camps framing is where it goes wrong. So, honestly: “Does it work?” is doing a lot of hidden work. Work for what? Energy, drive, well-being, those are subjective endpoints, and on subjective endpoints almost anything you commit to and pay for reports improvement at first. That’s not nothing, but it isn’t the same as the molecule doing what you think it’s doing. 150mg isn’t low dose. That’s a full replacement dose or above, for someone whose bloods are already in range. So you’re not topping up a gap, you’re pushing a normal system past where it sits. Different question entirely. What I’d actually want before deciding: what’s your metric, and how will you tell drive-from-testosterone apart from drive-from-finally-doing-something-about-the-stall? Those move together and the scale can’t sort them. The stalled-progress, stressful-job, plateaued bit reads to me like the question underneath isn’t really about a hormone. A compelling mechanism attached to an n of you is still an n of you. ymmv, and worth a proper chat with a doc who’ll run follow-up bloods, not just baseline.