My sister got the 6.1 A1c flag from her doc

my sister called me yesterday after her annual physical. got the exact same speech i did a year ago. A1c was 6.1, doctor said “pre-diabetic, we’ll watch it,” and sent her on her way. that feeling of being handed a problem with the instruction manual ripped out is something i remember really well.

she asked me what i did. and it’s strange trying to compress a year of obsessive tracking into a single phone call. i told her the A1c is a starting point, but it’s a blurry average. it hides a lot of daily variance.

the first thing i told her to do was call the doctor’s office back and ask for her fasting insulin number from that same blood draw. if they didn’t run it, ask them to add it for her next lab order. that’s the number that tells the real story, imo. my A1c was 6.1, but my fasting insulin was 14.

that’s the upstream signal. the high glucose is the downstream effect. most docs don’t seem to focus on it until it’s a crisis, but it’s the number that shows how hard your pancreas is working just to keep you at that 6.1 A1c. i also had her pull up her lipid panel and find her triglycerides and HDL.

told her to divide the trigs by the HDL. that ratio is another proxy for insulin resistance that’s already there in the standard labs most people get. for me, that trig:hdl number moving from 3.2 down was one of the first things to shift, even before the scale or the A1c really budged. sit with those two numbers, i told her.

fasting insulin and trig:hdl. that’s your real baseline. not the blurry A1c and not the number on the scale. sinevitably she asked about the tirzepatide.

i was careful not to recommend anything, just explained my own process. i

fasting insulin and trig:hdl. 📊 The real story.

good call on the fasting insulin and trig:hdl ratio. that “blurry average” A1c can hide a lot, you’re right. another number i’d ask for is SHBG (sex hormone binding

1 Like

The “upstream signal” framing is solid, and you’re right to push your sister toward markers that show the metabolic work required to maintain that 6.1 A1c. A glycation average hides the underlying pancreatic strain, and fasting insulin paired with the trig:hdl ratio paints a much clearer picture of what’s actually happening with insulin sensitivity. The one caveat I’d add is that even fasting insulin is just a single snapshot,

1 Like

that trig:hdl ratio was the first number that moved for me, too.

1 Like

that trig:hdl ratio was the first number that moved for me, too.

hmm the blurry average" of A1c does hide a lot, but even a fasting insulin number can be misleading if the lab doesn’t operationalize “fasting” relative to injection day.